• Home
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Economy
  • Interview
  • Reporting
  • Community
  • Vatra

Dielli | The Sun

Albanian American Newspaper Devoted to the Intellectual and Cultural Advancement of the Albanians in America | Since 1909

NATO-Kosovo Cooperation

June 21, 2017 by dgreca

1 David Philipsunnamed

By David L Phillips/*The Kosovo Security Force (KSF) should be upgraded into a full-standing army and integrated into NATO’s Partnership for Peace (PfP), which readies countries for full NATO membership.

The KSF was created soon after Kosovo declared independence in 2008. It is a small, lightly armed security and civil defense force akin to a national guard. It includes 2,500 members, equipped with rifles and lightweight armored vehicles. The KSF’s mission is limited to crisis response; responding to natural disasters; conducting search and rescue; disposing of explosive ordnance; and controlling hazardous materials. The KSF also does fire-fighting and other humanitarian tasks.

The KSF already cooperates with NATO. It was mentored by KFOR, NATO’s international peacekeeping force for Kosovo. It also receives assistance from the NATO Liaison and Advisory Team, building capacity to bring KSF in line with NATO standards.

A new and improved KSF would be a security asset. It could participate in NATO peacekeeping deployment to Afghanistan. It could also provide de-mining expertise to UN Mine Action Centers.

The United States has so far opposed turning the KSF into a national army. It worries that creation of a Kosovo army could disrupt the uneasy peace between Kosovo and Serbia.

US policy is evolving, reflecting changes on the ground.

Washington is concerned by Serbia stoking the flames of ethnic tension, as well as Russia’s meddling and provocations.

Serbia feigns commitment to the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue, while fomenting conflict in Mitrovica, a territory in northern Kosovo where Serbs challenge Kosovo’s sovereignty through private parallel structures.

Serbia invited a Russian-made train with nationalist images and slogans reading “Kosovo is Serbia” to travel from Serbia to Mitrovica in January 2017. Serbian politicians threatened military action when the train was stopped at the border.

Belgrade blocks Kosovo from gaining greater global recognition. Serbia and Russia coordinated a campaign to prevent Kosovo from joining UNESCO.

Serbia and Russia have extensive security cooperation. Russia recently transferred fighter jets and other sophisticated weaponry to Serbia, including surface to air missiles. Russia established an intelligence base in Nis as a counter-weight to NATO.

Russia was behind a coup attempt in Montenegro last November, aimed at preventing Montenegro from joining NATO. Two Russians were arrested for coordinating the operation from Serbia and plotting to assassinate Montenegro’s Prime Minister.

In April, Russia’s support for ultranationalists in Macedonia almost precipitated a civil war. According to Federica Mogherini, the EU’s foreign policy chief, attacking the parliament was intended to spark inter-ethnic strife. Mogherini warned of a “geopolitical confrontation” with Russia.

There are thousands of US troops at Camp Bondsteel in Ferizaj in Eastern Kosovo. The deployment helps maintain stability and serves as a tripwire against aggression. The United States should make Kosovo a greater priority in its regional security strategy.

Kosovo is a reliable ally. It is strongly pro-American and pro-NATO. Building Kosovo’s capacity would allow Kosovo to better provide for its own security, complementing KFOR.

Kosovo Serbs reflexively oppose Kosovo’s cooperation with NATO. They have bitter memories of NATO’s intervention in 1999.

Upgrading the KSF into a national army must be done carefully to avoid opening old wounds. It requires a transparent and legal process. The KSF was established in Kosovo’s constitution. Its status can be changed through a constitutional amendment, with support from two-thirds of the parliament.

Making a serious effort to get Kosovo Serbs on board would send a positive message. While mollifying their concerns, Kosovo Serbs do not have a veto. They must abide by Kosovo’s decision.

Kosovo Serbs will realize that their interests are served by Kosovo’s cooperation with NATO, which acts as a deterrent to foreign interference. Russian provocations aimed at causing conflict between Kosovo and Serbia actually put Kosovo Serbs at-risk.

The Western Balkans remain a tinderbox. International order is served through a strong, stable, and sovereign Kosovo.

*David L. Phillips is Director of the Program on Peace-building and Rights at Columbia University’s Institute for the Study of Human Rights. He served as a Senior Adviser for Regional Stability at the European Affairs Bureau of the State Department under President Bill Clinton. He is author of Liberating Kosovo: Coercive Diplomacy and US Intervention.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Analiza Tagged With: David L Phillips, NATO-Kosovo Cooperation

Iraqi Kurdistan’s Path to Independence

June 16, 2017 by dgreca

1-David-Philips

By David L. Phillips/ Masoud Barzani, President of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), announced a referendum on Iraqi Kurdistan’s independence for September 25, 2017. The referendum will be held in all territory controlled by the KRG, as well as historically Kurdish lands claimed by the Iraqi government.

1 Kurdistan

The overwhelming majority of Kurds want independence. In July 2003, a group of Kurdish intellectuals in Suleimani launched the Kurdistan Referendum Movement. Voters were given two options in an unofficial tally on January 30, 2005. : (1) to stay a part of Iraq, or (2) to be independent. A total of 1,998,061 people participated in the referendum. The pro-independence vote garnered 98.8 percent support.

Kurds moderated their national aspirations, deferring their demand for independence. They supported Iraq’s 2005 constitution, which declared Iraq as a federal, democratic republic.

Despite fraternal talk about “Iraqi brothers,” Kurds are deeply distrustful of Baghdad.

Article 140 of Iraq’s constitution envisioned a referendum on the status of Kirkuk by the end of 2007. However, Baghdad repeatedly missed the deadline. Failure to address Kirkuk’s status has exacerbated other core Kurdish concerns such as the ownership of natural resources, control of oil revenues, and the role of Kurdish militia called “Peshmerga.”

Today Iraq exists in name only. Iraqi Kurdistan exercises all the elements of statehood, except it lacks an international legal personality.

A declaration of independence is meaningless unless other countries are on board. Front-line states predictably disapprove of Barzani’s referendum. However, their objections are less shrill than they might have been.

The Government of Iraq (GoI) objects primarily to the timing of the referendum. It also objects to holding the vote in Kirkuk and other disputed territories.

The GoI needs support from Kurds. It is counting on Kurdish participation in Iraqi provincial elections later this year and parliamentary elections in 2018.

Tehran opposes the referendum. However, its opposition was less strident than expected after the recent terror attack by ISIS. When Iranian officials admonished the Kurds for standing against “the unity” of Iraq, the KRG told them to stop “meddling.”

While Turkey’s Prime Minister Binali Yildirim called the referendum “irresponsible,” President Tayyip Erdogan was silent. Erdogan’s view is only one that matters in Turkey. There is more money to be made by Erdogan and his cronies by controlling the transport of oil and gas from Iraqi Kurdistan to the Turkish port of Ceyhan on the Mediterranean.

Syria is too destroyed to pay more than lip service to events in Iraqi Kurdistan. Though Iraqi Kurds and Syrian Kurds do not get along, Damascus fears that Syrian Kurds in Rojava (Afrin, Kobani, and Jazeera provinces) will also seek independence. Syrian Kurds already exercise a high degree of democratic autonomy.

America’s position is critical. The US and KRG enjoy a strategic partnership. Not only do Iraqi Kurds and Americans share values, there is extensive security cooperation. Peshmerga turned the tide against ISIS. Peshmerga liberated large swaths of territory in Northern Iraq and fought bravely in Mosul.

The Trump administration is trying to be even-handed. It is committed to “a unified, stable, democratic, and a federal Iraq.” At the same time, the State Department expressed understanding for the “legitimate aspirations of the people of Iraqi Kurdistan.”

America’s top priority is destroying ISIS. For now, the Trump administration is nominally opposed to independence because it fears that independence will distract from the urgent priority to defeat ISIS.

US officials know that Iraqi Kurdistan will be the next newest nation. They do not question whether Iraqi Kurdistan will become independent, but rather when and how.

The KRG needs a plan for the day after its referendum.

KRG officials must not to move precipitously to declare independence. They should negotiate the details of a friendly divorce with Baghdad and work cooperatively on shared problems – the ISIS threat, the return of displaced people, and managing the region’s economic crisis.

I directed Columbia University’s task force on “State-Building in Iraqi Kurdistan.” Iraqi Kurdistan faced a perfect storm of problems in 2015. It was attacked by ISIS. It managed a humanitarian emergency, providing for more than two million internally displaced persons. World oil prices collapsed, and the KRG’s budget shortfall was exacerbated by Baghdad’s pernicious decision to cancel revenue sharing from the sale of existing energy resources.

Today, the situation is more stable.

Announcing a date for the referendum is a big step on the path to independence. Going forward, the KRG should patiently negotiate with Baghdad. However, negotiations must not be open-ended. Twelve months, after the referendum (September 2018), the KRG should declare independence with or without Baghdad’s agreement.

It is never the perfect time to assert one’s right to self-determination. Faced with an inevitable outcome, Baghdad will come around.

Meanwhile, the KRG must get its house in order. It must consolidate democracy, strengthen democratic institutions, and overcome internal divisions. It must recommit itself to minority rights and women’s rights. Ezidis need special privileges and protection. Independence of Iraqi Kurdistan will be a unifying event, helping to overcome factionalism among northerners. Independence will also be an inspirational event, enabling interests solidarity among Kurds across the region.

The US cannot stand on the sideline. There is a Kurdish adage: “Kurds have no friend but the mountains.” In the Arab Middle East, the US has no better friend than the Kurds.

David L. Phillips is Director of the Program on Peace-building and Rights at Columbia University’s Institute for the Study of Human Rights. He worked as a Senior Adviser and Foreign Affairs Expert at the State Department’s Near Eastern Affairs Bureau where he worked on the Future of Iraq Project. He has authored many books on Kurdish issues such as Losing Iraq: Inside the Postwar Reconstruction Fiasco, The Kurdish Spring: A New Map for the Middle East, and An Uncertain Ally: Turkey Under Erdogan’s Dictatorship.(The Huffington Post.)

Filed Under: Analiza Tagged With: David L Phillips, Iraqi Kurdistan’s Path, to Independence

Not on American Soil:Responding to the Beating of Americans by Erdogan’s Security Personnel

June 7, 2017 by dgreca

1-david

By David L. Phillips/ Members of President Tayyip Erdogan’s security detail beat up protesters in Washington, DC on May 16, 2017. Eleven people were injured and two hospitalized.The Sub-committee on Europe, Eurasia, and Emerging Threats of the House Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing on May 25 to consider “Violence Outside the Turkish Ambassador’s Residence.” Chairman Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) said at the hearing: “The attack by members of President Erdogan’s security detail on peaceful protesters earlier this month was offensive and showed a deep disrespect for the United States and the values we cherish. Those responsible should be punished as the law allows and I call on our own authorities to make sure such a situation is never again allowed to occur.”

Rohrabacher called Erdogan an “Islamo-fascist” who is an “enemy of the United States and an enemy of his own people.” According to Rohrabacher, “Political violence and suppression came to characterize Turkey at home and abroad.”

Congressman Ed Royce (R-CA), Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced H. Res. 354 condemning Turkey’s actions. The Resolution indicted “Turkish officials blatantly suppressed the First Amendment rights of United States citizens, and multiple armed Turkish security officials beat, kicked, and choked unarmed demonstrators.”

Outrage was bipartisan. Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking Member Eliot Engel (D-NY), House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) joined Royce in introducing H. Res. 354, and issued a joint statement: “Last week’s unprovoked attack on peaceful protesters by Turkish security forces on American soil must not go unanswered…those responsible must face justice.” Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) called the violence “indefensible.”

With strong support from Congressman Rohrabacher and others, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed H. Res. 354 on June 6, condemning Turkey. It recommends that those who “directed, oversaw, or participated in efforts by Turkish security forces to illegally suppress peaceful protests on May 16, 2017, should be charged and prosecuted under United States law.”

Can we identify the perpetrators? The New York Times published a frame-by-frame analysis of the incident.

It reported, “Ten of the men who attacked the protesters appear to be part of the formal security detail. They are dressed in dark suits, and they wore an in-ear radio receiver, Turkish breast pins and identification cards. At least four of the men carried guns.”

Another man displayed an “identity card showing Turkey’s presidential seal, suggesting he is a member of Erdogan’s delegation.”

Six of the attackers “wore outfits resembling uniforms worn by Turkish guards. Two of these men were carrying guns.”

According to The New York Times, “Three men charged the protesters. One man knocked two women to the ground, and another man repeatedly punched Lucy Usoyan, a protester, as she lay on the ground.”

Video of the incident shows Erdogan arriving at the Turkish ambassador’s residence in his motorcade. Erdogan’s adviser leans into the window of the car and has a conversation with Erdogan. According to a witness, “The order came from Erdogan to his adviser to the head of the security detail — attack, attack.” During the brutalization, Erdogan steps out of his vehicle and dispassionately surveys the scene.

The United States should demand that Erdogan issue a public apology, as well as a written apology to each of the victims. Turkey should pay reparations to those attacked. The US State Department should request a waiver of immunity of Turkish security officials involved in the incident, enabling their extradition to the United States and prosecution.

If these steps are not taken, the US should take punitive measures.

The movements of Ambassador Serdar Kilic should be restricted to 100 feet of the Turkish ambassador’s residence. If Turkey does not cooperate with the investigation, Kilic should be evicted from the United States.

Investigators should identify and prosecute Turkish-Americans who participated in the melee, in addition to prosecuting members of Erdogan’s security detail.

A Congressional resolution should prohibit the sale of debt by the Turkish government to American banks. The resolution should also call on US banks holding Turkish debt to accelerate demands for repayment.

US agencies should find out where Erdogan keeps his money outside of Turkey and take steps to freeze his assets, pending civil suits by the victims.

The US should suspend the sale of small arms and other weapons to Turkey.

The Congress should expand assistance to civil society and independent media within Turkey.

The American people have a right to know the full details of what happened. The DC Metropolitan Police should publish the results of its investigation, and release intercepted communications of Turkish security involved in the assault.

I know Lucy and some of the other victims personally. While attacking protesters is routine in Turkey, impunity for Turkish security officers must not be tolerated in the United States. The incident is a repeat of what happened last year outside the Brookings Institution.

The victims of violence outside the Turkish ambassador’s residence welcome bipartisan support for H. Res. 354. Now they demand action and accountability.

David L. Phillips is Director of the Program on Peace-building and Rights at Columbia University’s Institute for the Study of Human Rights. He served as a Senior Adviser and Foreign Affairs Expert at the US Department of State. His recent book is An Uncertain Ally: Turkey Under Erdogan’s Dictatorship.

 

Filed Under: Analiza Tagged With: David L Phillips, Erdogan, Not on American Oil

Turkey’s Influence Peddling

May 23, 2017 by dgreca

By David L. Phillips*/

1-David-PhilipsDonald J. Trump promised to drain the swamp of lobbyists and influence peddlers. Yet, Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdogan has spent millions to influence the US government. Erdogan feels sufficiently immune that he watched his personal security beat up peaceful protesters in broad daylight just minutes after meeting Trump at the White House.

The government of Turkey has bought an army of advocates, including high profile individuals with ties to the Trump administration, lobbying firms, and thinks-tanks.

The Flynn Intel Group was paid $500,000 to represent Turkey’s national security interests. Flynn belatedly disclosed the transaction, as required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act, after his Turkish ties were exposed.

Giuliani and Mukasey were hired to join the legal team of Reza Zarrab, the Iran sanctions evader, charged with money laundering. After being hired by Zarrab, Giuliani and Mukasey immediately travelled to Ankara to coordinate activities with Erdogan, raising doubts about who was their client.

Lobbyists are well remunerated. Turkey pays the Gephardt Group $141,000/month; Amsterdam Partners gets $50,000/month (for working on the Gulen extradition); Greenberg Traurig, Giuliani’s law firm, receives $40,000/month; Capitol Counsel gets $32,000/month; Mercury $20,000/month; Madison Group $20,000/month; McBee Signal $20,000/month; Jim Arnold $20,000/month; MediaFix $9,000/month. Turkey paid APCO Associates $741,000 in 2016.

And yesterday, Turkey signed a fixed fee representation agreement with Burson-Marsteller to provide integrated public relations. Work includes media outreach, monitoring and analysis, event support, stakeholder engagement, and social media counsel.

The deal was announced just days after Erdogan security attacked US citizens protesting Turkey’s human rights record, which the D.C. Metropolitan Police called a “brutal attack on peaceful protesters.”

Lobbyists typically represent foreign interests, no matter how heinous. K Street lobbying firms will almost never turn down lucrative contacts.

But think-tanks have a choice.

Think-tanks may believe that the Turkish government is giving them money because it values their work. However, the governance committees of think-tanks shouldn’t be deluded. Turkey gives money to buy influence and legitimacy.

There should be a voluntary code of conduct for think-tanks.

Think-tanks should not accept gifts from the Turkish government or from any Turkish entity allegedly involved in criminal activity or money laundering. For example, the Vice President of HalkBank is under arrest for helping Iran evade sanctions.

Think-tanks must not allow their activities to be manipulated. They should not co-sponsor conferences with Turkish government ministries, allow sponsors to dictate topics, veto panelists, or give a platform for Erdogan and his cronies to look legitimate.

If think-tanks have offices in Turkey, the offices should be closed. Doing so would send a message against business as usual.

Think-tanks must not offer policy advice to Turkish officials, even via seemingly innocuous policy roundtables.

They must not represent Turkish interests before US government agencies. Employees of think-tanks that have accepted funds from the Turkish government must not act as witnesses before Congressional committees, which violates “truth in testimony” rules.

Washington is broken. Influence peddling is pervasive. Time to blow the whistle on Beltway bandits. Silence is complicity

*David L. Phillips is Director of the Program on Peace-building and Rights at Columbia University’s Institute for the Study of Human Rights. He served as a Senior Adviser and Foreign Affairs Expert at the State Department during the administrations of Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama. His new book is An Uncertain Ally: Turkey Under Erdogan’s Dictatorship.

Filed Under: Analiza Tagged With: David L Phillips, Turkey’s Influence Peddling

Defining a Foreign Terrorist Organization

May 19, 2017 by dgreca

1-David-PhilipsBy David L. PHILLIPS/

Donald J. Trump declared: “We support Turkey in the first fight against terror and terror groups like ISIS and the PKK, and ensure they have no safe quarter, the terror groups” (16 May 2017). Equating the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) shows a profound lack of nuance. While the United States lists both ISIS and the PKK as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), their ideology and tactics are dramatically different.

ISIS was founded in 2006 based on the radical ideology of Jihadi-Salafism. As an offshoot of al-Qaeda, ISIS employs a harsh interpretation of Islamic law, justifying anti-Shiite sectarian views. ISIS believes that Shia are conspiring with the United States and secular Arab rulers to limit Salafi power in the Middle East.

Brutal tactics by ISIS against non-believers include beheadings, stoning, and burning victims alive. ISIS practices mass rape and sexual slavery of Ezidis and Christians. It uses social media to recruit disenfranchised, uneducated, and poverty-stricken youth. ISIS maintains its caliphate will purify Muslim lands and purge non-believers.

The PKK is different. The PKK was established in 1978 as a secular and nationalist movement. It adopted armed struggle to defend Kurds from the Turkish State’s systematic oppression. Resistance was in response to well-documented human rights abuses, and Turkey’s brutal counterinsurgency. In the 1980s and 90s, thousands of Kurds were killed or disappeared by government-backed death squads and security services. Young people were drawn not by a slick social media campaign, but by the romantic appeal of Kurdish guerillas standing up for Kurdish political and cultural rights against vastly superior Turkish forces.

Approximately 40,000 people died during Turkey’s civil war since the 1980s. The PKK ultimately abandoned its goal of an independent greater Kurdistan, seeking negotiations. It declared unilateral ceasefires in 1993, 2003 and 2013. According to PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan: “The democratic option is the only alternative to solving the Kurdish question. Separation is neither possible nor necessary. We want peace, dialogue, and free political action within the framework of a democratic Turkish state.”

There is another important difference between ISIS and the PKK. ISIS deliberately targets Americans and US interests with assassination and violence. The PKK has never killed an American.

Trump should get his facts straight. Heinous murderers belonging to ISIS are different from freedom fighters, even if both use sensational violence.

David L. Phillips is Director of the Program on Peace-building and Rights at Columbia University’s Institute for the Study of Human Rights. He served as a Senior Adviser and Foreign Affairs Expert at the US State Department. His recent book is An Uncertain Ally: Turkey Under Erdogan’s Dictatorship.

Filed Under: Opinion Tagged With: David L Phillips, Defining a Foreign, Terrorist Organization

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next Page »

Artikujt e fundit

  • NDAA i SHBA-së dhe pozicioni i Kosovës në arkitekturën e sigurisë
  • Alis Kallaçi do të çojë zërin dhe dhimbjen e “Nân”-s shqiptare në Eurovision Song
  • Garë për pushtet…
  • Njëqind vjet vetmi!
  • “Shënime për historinë antike të shqiptarëve”*
  • Si funksionon sistemi juridik në Shqipëri dhe pse ai ka nevojë për korrigjim?
  • Emisionet postare festive të fundvitit në Kosovë
  • JAKOBSTADS TIDNING (1939) / MBRETI ZOG, SHUMË BUJAR ME BAKSHISHE. — EMRI I TIJ NUK DO TË HARROHET KAQ SHPEJT NGA PRONARËT DHE PERSONELI I HOTELEVE NË VARSHAVË.
  • HAFIZ SHERIF LANGU, DELEGATI I PAVARËSISË TË CILIT IU MOHUA KONTRIBUTI PËR 50 VJET ME RRADHË, KLERIKU DHE VEPRIMTARI I SHQUAR I ÇËSHTJES KOMBËTARE
  • RIPUSHTIMI I KOSOVËS – KUVENDI I PRIZRENIT 1945
  • Nikola Tesla, gjeniu që u fiksua pas pëllumbave dhe u dashurua me njërin prej tyre
  • Bahamas njeh Kosovën!
  • Legjenda e portës shkodrane, Paulin Ndoja (19 dhjetor 1945 – 16 prill 2025) do të mbushte sot 80 vjeç
  • “Roli dhe kontributi i diplomacisë shqiptare në Maqedoninë e Veriut nga pavarësia deri sot”
  • Marie Shllaku, kur një jetë e re u shndërrua në përjetësi kombëtare

Kategoritë

Arkiv

Tags

albano kolonjari alfons Grishaj Anton Cefa arben llalla asllan Bushati Astrit Lulushi Aurenc Bebja Behlul Jashari Beqir Sina dalip greca Elida Buçpapaj Elmi Berisha Enver Bytyci Ermira Babamusta Eugjen Merlika Fahri Xharra Frank shkreli Fritz radovani Gezim Llojdia Ilir Levonja Interviste Keze Kozeta Zylo Kolec Traboini kosova Kosove Marjana Bulku Murat Gecaj nderroi jete ne Kosove Nene Tereza presidenti Nishani Rafaela Prifti Rafael Floqi Raimonda Moisiu Ramiz Lushaj reshat kripa Sadik Elshani SHBA Shefqet Kercelli shqiperia shqiptaret Sokol Paja Thaci Vatra Visar Zhiti

Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT